Legal Opinion

All Church Press Inc. v. Harris Advertising Agency Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1927No. 17842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) While each .of the “contracts” upon which the suit was based was signed by both parties, they were not such contracts as could be enforced in the courts, because lacking in mutuality. To have a contract upon which an action will lie, both parties must be bound thereby. Under the terms of the “contracts” sued upon, there was no absolute promise on the part of advertising agency to do anything. The contracts provided that a certain amount of space must be used within one year from the date of the first insertion, but no time is set for the first insertion,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Retailers Service Bureau v. Newman, Frierson & McEver Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Crown Construction Co. v. Opelika Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  3. Mion & Murray Co. v. World Wide Pictures Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Haverty Furniture Co. v. Lyon-Young Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API