Legal Opinion

Huxford v. Eslow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Bill of foreclosure and cross-bill. Complainant in cross-bill appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Hnxford filed his bill to foreclose a mortgage given by Eslow and others, June 14, 1869, for $10,000, payable with 10 per cent, interest on or before ten years from date. A portion of this sum of $10,000 was not advanced until some months after the date of the securities. Payments were made from time to time, and the interest was reduced to 8 per cent. This bill was filed claiming a balance still duo.

Defendant Eslow, who is the only party in interest, answered, insisting that the mortgage had been overpaid, and filed his cross-bill to recover the overpayment, and the statutory penalty of $100…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. FalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Shelton v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Caves v. BartekNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API