Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Action in assumpsit to recover the statutory penalty for reproducing a copyrighted photograph. On motion by defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto.
1Opinion of the Court
McPHERSON, District Judge.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover from the defendant the statutory penalty for reproducing a copyrighted photograph without the owner’s consent. A verdict-lias been rendered fo-r the plaintiff, and the pending motion is based upon the following reservation of a question of law:
“Upon the 29 th day of September one copy of the October number [of the infringing magazine] was bought by the office boy of Mr, Hyneman, and at a somewhat later hour of the same day the deputy marshal went to the office *968of. the defendant with two writs, — one a writ of replevin, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bolles v. Outing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bolles v. Outing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Thornton v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Morrison v. PettiboneU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rinehart v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1903
- Stern v. RemickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908