Legal Opinion

Louis Arnold IV v. Phillip Baldwin and Scroggins Law Office, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 2026No. 3:24-cv-02020Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LOUIS ARNOLD IV, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 24-cv-02020-JPG ) PHILLIP BALDWIN ) and SCROGGINS LAW OFFICE, LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GILBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Louis Arnold, IV, brings this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

to challenge his civil commitment proceedings. (Doc. 18). Arnold’s initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, his application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied, and the case was dismissed. Pursuant to a timely motion to reconsider (Doc. 13),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Mitchell Zimmerman v. Glenn BornickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  5. Always Towing & Recovery Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API