Louis Arnold IV v. Phillip Baldwin and Scroggins Law Office, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LOUIS ARNOLD IV, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 24-cv-02020-JPG ) PHILLIP BALDWIN ) and SCROGGINS LAW OFFICE, LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GILBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Louis Arnold, IV, brings this action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
to challenge his civil commitment proceedings. (Doc. 18). Arnold’s initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, his application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied, and the case was dismissed. Pursuant to a timely motion to reconsider (Doc. 13),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mitchell Zimmerman v. Glenn BornickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Always Towing & Recovery Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.