Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glover v. EIGHTH JUD. DIST. COURT OF STATE

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2009No. 51941Published

1DissentCherry, J.

I respectfully dissent because I disagree with the majority’s conclusions that defense counsel acted improperly and that there was a manifest necessity for a mistrial. I therefore would grant the petition.

The negative inference

The majority concludes, without citation to authority, that it is improper to argue a negative inference from the assertion of a proper hearsay objection. To the contrary, it is my view that this case presents the exact situation for which the negative inference is intended.

A videotaped interview of a defendant shortly after a shooting is the type of evidence that one…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API