Legal Opinion
In THE MATTER OF REYNOLDS v. Dustman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division to determine the appeal taken to that Court.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondents’ jail time credit determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the merits in a paper which, although labeled a “decision,” ended with a sentence stating that “[t]his decision shall constitute the order of the court.” The paper was neither stamped with a date and place of entry, nor signed by the clerk. On August 8,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Norstar Bank of Upstate NY v. Office Control Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Halpin v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Porowski v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mileski v. MSC Indus. Direct Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mokay v. MokayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. TitmasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In Re AcevedoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- People v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.