Legal Opinion

Neal v. Green

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1966No. 38782PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the requirements pertaining to timely filing of the appeal bond, transcript and statement of facts.

We find no prejudice to respondents resulting from the late filing of the appeal bond.

Although we find that the transcript and statement of facts were filed late, this court is hesitant to punish litigants for neglect of their counsel. Timely filing of a transcript and statement of facts is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to review. Beagle v. Beagle, 55 Wn.2d 908, 349 P.2d 241 (1960).

In the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beagle v. BeagleWashington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Grobe v. Valley Garbage Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hoirup v. Empire Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Shoberg v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API