Legal Opinion

Colglazier v. Louisville, N. A. & C. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided July 1, 1884Published

Law. Motion to remand.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Tbe action was commenced in a state court, — the circuit court of Washington county. The complaint charges that the defendant was, on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1883, “the owner of a certain railroad known as and called the Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Bailway; that said railway extended from the city of Louisville, in the state of Kentucky, to the city of Chicago, in the state of Illinois;” and that on that day, at the town of Salem, Washington county, Indiana, through which town, county, and state said road passes, the plaintiff, as a passenger, entered one of the cars of said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muller v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. St. Louis, A. & T. H. R. v. Indianapolis & St. L. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1879
  3. Copeland v. Memphis & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API