Legal Opinion
Healey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered January 28, 1994, which, inter alia, denied defendant Firestone’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint and which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant All-Inn Trucking, modified, on the law, only to the extent of granting Firestone’s motion to dismiss all claims against it other than those based upon the defective design of the subject tire rim and, as so modified, the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In light of, among other things, the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Treston v. AllegrettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Franov v. Exxon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Wecht v. Dial Chevrolet Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- DiDomenico v. C & S Aeromatik Supplies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kirkland v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Healey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mahase v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Standard Fire Insurance v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.