Lester Associates v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Lester Associates is entitled to a refund of the real estate transfer tax (transfer tax)1 because the March 20, *4001995 deed was void ab initio. I disagree because:
• The common pleas court’s order did not determine that the deed was void ab initio for the purpose of a deed transfer tax and, in any event, because it was a default judgment, it can have no preclu-sive effect.
• A deed cannot be void ab initio and this deed was not because the parties presented a deed for recording, warranting that it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sabatine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Comach Construction, Inc. v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Borough of Elizabeth v. Aim Sher Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lester Associates v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.