Legal Opinion

Lester Associates v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 2003Published

1Opinion

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Lester Associates is entitled to a refund of the real estate transfer tax (transfer tax)1 because the March 20, *4001995 deed was void ab initio. I disagree because:

• The common pleas court’s order did not determine that the deed was void ab initio for the purpose of a deed transfer tax and, in any event, because it was a default judgment, it can have no preclu-sive effect.

• A deed cannot be void ab initio and this deed was not because the parties presented a deed for recording, warranting that it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Sabatine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Comach Construction, Inc. v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Borough of Elizabeth v. Aim Sher Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Lester Associates v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API