Legal Opinion

Fox v. . Steele

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a scire facias against the defendants, who became securities for the prosecution of a writ of certiorari. The plaintiff failed in his action, and it is contended that the bond is void upon the ground the court below had no power to require the plaintiff to give bond for the prosecution; that the act of the General Assembly had not directed the clerk to take such security, and that the authority of the court was usurped. It is also objected that if the bond should be considered valid, it cannot be enforced by scire facias.

We are unanimously of opinion that there is nothing in the first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDowell v. . TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
  2. Russell v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  3. McDowell v. . BradleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
  4. Speight v. . WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deloach v. . WorkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API