Demers v. Flack
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
The plaintiff contends that the shock of the collision caused the top of her head to come into violent contact with some part of the interior of her car and that soon after the accident she suffered severe pain in her head and jaw. About three weeks after the accident x-ray pictures of her teeth were taken and they disclosed a fracture of the root of one of her molars. This condition necessitated the extraction of that tooth and thereafter her jaw became swollen, painful and finally immobile. For this condition she required hospital treatment, was unable for several weeks to take anything but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flynn v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Seeton v. DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Brody v. GilbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Nadeau v. StevensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Tuttle v. FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leavitt v. BaconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Roy v. ChalifouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Atherton v. RoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Hersey v. FritzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941