Legal Opinion

Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Hamil

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1922No. 9702. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Stephens County; Harry Tom King, Judge. • Suit by Osear J. Hamil against the Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company and another, in which certain other parties intervened. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants and the interveners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

Oscar J. Hamil instituted this suit in the form of trespass to try title against the Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company and ' the Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Company to recover title to 160 acres of land situated in Stephens county, Tex.; also to remove as a cloud from plaintiff’s title an oil and gas lease on the land executed by Lizzie Hamil for herself and as guardian of the estate of her three minor children to the Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company, and a deed of assignment by that company to an undivided one-half interest in said lease in, favor of the Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Company.

The two oil…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. LevertonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wooldridge v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1888

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Francis v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Rosek v. KotzurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Hauser v. ZookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Barrett v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Turner v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API