Legal Opinion
Holley v. Hooper
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 8, 1947No. 9649PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Justice.
This suit was brought for specific performance of a contract for the sale by ap-pellee, W. R. Hooper, and the purchase by appellants, C. R. Holley and Paul F. Melton, Sr., of an undivided % interest in the Naylor Plotel located in San Angelo, Texas.
The contract, as executed by appellee, reads:
“June 21, 1946.
“I, W. R. Hooper, being the owner of three-fourths undivided interest of the Nay-lor Hotel, San Angelo, Texas, do hereby agree to sell my interests in said hotel for three-fourths of the price of $252,500.00 which is the net sale price.
*121“I agree to take care of my pro rata…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turnley v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
- Crossland v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Sandbrook v. W. L. Morrison Invest. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
- Overshiner v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Hope v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Downing and Wooten Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Felber v. Sklar Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- John D. Byram and Airport 71 Land, Ltd. v. Bradley S. Scott and Austin Airport Parking, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- John D. Byram and Airport 71 Land, Ltd. v. Bradley S. Scott and Austin Airport Parking, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009