Legal Opinion

Holley v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1947No. 9649PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This suit was brought for specific performance of a contract for the sale by ap-pellee, W. R. Hooper, and the purchase by appellants, C. R. Holley and Paul F. Melton, Sr., of an undivided % interest in the Naylor Plotel located in San Angelo, Texas.

The contract, as executed by appellee, reads:

“June 21, 1946.
“I, W. R. Hooper, being the owner of three-fourths undivided interest of the Nay-lor Hotel, San Angelo, Texas, do hereby agree to sell my interests in said hotel for three-fourths of the price of $252,500.00 which is the net sale price.
*121“I agree to take care of my pro rata…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turnley v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  2. Crossland v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Sandbrook v. W. L. Morrison Invest. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Overshiner v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Hope v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Downing and Wooten Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Felber v. Sklar Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. John D. Byram and Airport 71 Land, Ltd. v. Bradley S. Scott and Austin Airport Parking, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. John D. Byram and Airport 71 Land, Ltd. v. Bradley S. Scott and Austin Airport Parking, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API