Legal Opinion

State v. Kalogeropoulos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-2654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

The state appeals an order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4). Because we hold that the state did not file a legally sufficient traverse, we affirm the trial court’s order.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss in this vehicular homicide case alleged that there were no material disputed facts and then detailed a great number of facts surrounding the accident in this case. In response to all of the defendant’s details, the state’s traverse generally denied that there were no material disputed facts, denied in part and admitted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. State v. HamlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. State v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Branciforte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KalogeropolousSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. State v. SammonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API