Dickle v. Abstract Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. Andrew Allison, Ch.
1Opinion of the Court
Turney, Ch. J.
Complainants purchased from Bowman, a resident of California, at the price of $200 per acre, a tract of land, represented to contain twenty-one acres and thirty-six poles, in Davidson County.
Complainants declined to purchase until they *432were furnished with an abstract of title. Bowman thereupon applied to defendants to make the abstract, which was done, and Bowman paid for it. They delivered the abstract to Bowman, and guaranteed it to be a true and perfect abstract of the title. On being furnished with the abstract, which showed the title to be in Bowman, complainants made the…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- John Martin Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Tartera v. PalumboTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.