United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc., Nathan Yorke and the Union Central Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
In a prior phase of this litigation, we held that Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S'.C. § 185(a)) did not confer upon the United Steelworkers of America (“Union”) the right to intervene in a declaratory judgment and interpleader action brought by Union Central Life Insurance Company (“Union Central”) with respect to an insurance policy issued to Hamilton Steel Products, Inc. (“Hamilton”). See 374 F.2d 820. Shortly after the promulgation of that opinion, the Union filed its own suit, purportedly based on Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act and on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- The Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Hamilton Steel Products Inc. v. United Steel Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Union Central Life Ins. Co., Inc. v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc., Tom Webb v. Agnes O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. KaplanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- National Surety Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Union Central Life Insurance v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971