State v. Mayes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends that at the trial de novo in superior court his motion to quash the felony indictment, which arose out of the same conduct for which he received the misdemeanor conviction in district court, should have been allowed. He is correct.
In Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 40 L.Ed. 2d 628 (1974), it was held that the prosecutor could not “up the ante” and try a person for a felony in the de novo trial where the person was charged and convicted of a misdemeanor in district court. Blackledge, which arose in North Carolina, was decided on the theory of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. SchalowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. SchalowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021