Legal Opinion

(PC) Jackson v. Pfeiffer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 9, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00452Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUWAYNE M. JACKSON, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00452-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915(e)(2)(A) 14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., (Doc. 28) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Plaintiff Duwayne M. Jackson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff filed this action on March 12, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On March 18, 2021, he submitted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API