Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation v. Perryman (In re Perryman)

ORDER

TOM R. CORNISH, United States Bankruptcy Judge.

On this 18th day of January, 1996, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Response came on for consideration. Both parties agree that there are no disputed facts. The only dispute is whether the debt is dischargeable.

After a review of the above-referenced pleadings, this Court does hereby enter the following findings and conclusions in conformity with Rule 7052, Fed.R.Bankr.P., in this core proceeding:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. On or about November 26, 1986, the Debtor, Linda Sue Perryman (“Perryman”), was authorized as an agent…