Legal Opinion

Smith v. Carlson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Plaintiff assigns that the court erred in making and entering a decree herein dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Plaintiff submits that in a tax foreclosure suit there are only a judgment and order of sale, and the sheriff’s deed is prima facie evidence of the regular entry of the sale and all antecedent proceedings, citing §§ 69-820 and 69-828, Oregon Code 1930.

Such a sheriff’s deed is only prima facie evidence' of the regularity of the sale and of the antecedent proceedings and may be attacked on account of invalidity shown in the record. There are several defects claimed by defendants in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bagley v. BlochOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Walton v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Peterson v. Graham Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Watson v. JantzerOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Barber v. NewbeginOregon Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Childs v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Darling v. ChristensenOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API