Belyeu v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The plaintiff relies upon a verbal .contract for his right to a commission. This was sufficient. This court has held repeatedly that it is not necessary that authority to sell land should be in writing. The reason, is that a contract employing an agent to find a purchaser for land is not within the statute of frauds. Blanton v. Jonesboro Building & Loan Association, 176 Ark. 315, 3 S. W. (2d) 964; Vanemburg v. Duffey, 177 Ark. 663, 7 S. W. (2d) 236.
According to tbe testimony of Hudson, be bad yerbal authority from Belyeu to sell tbe seven-acre tract of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Jasper v. Tartar, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Blanton v. Jonesboro Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Vanemburg v. DuffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walthour v. FinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Bennett v. WisdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Green v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975