Legal Opinion

Belyeu v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The plaintiff relies upon a verbal .contract for his right to a commission. This was sufficient. This court has held repeatedly that it is not necessary that authority to sell land should be in writing. The reason, is that a contract employing an agent to find a purchaser for land is not within the statute of frauds. Blanton v. Jonesboro Building & Loan Association, 176 Ark. 315, 3 S. W. (2d) 964; Vanemburg v. Duffey, 177 Ark. 663, 7 S. W. (2d) 236.

According to tbe testimony of Hudson, be bad yerbal authority from Belyeu to sell tbe seven-acre tract of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Jasper v. Tartar, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Blanton v. Jonesboro Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Vanemburg v. DuffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walthour v. FinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Bennett v. WisdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Green v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API