Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Acosta

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided February 15, 2001No. 00-04238Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.,

Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 311(d), the Commonwealth appeals the order of this court dated December 4, 2000, granting defendant Miqueas Acosta’s motion to suppress. This opinion is filed in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1925(a).

At the suppression hearing, the defendant argued that the search was unlawful because it was made pursuant to a pre-textual stop; it was the result of an illegal seizure; the consent given was not voluntary; and because the defendant was incapable of consenting to a search. This court ordered the suppression of all evidence obtained after the stop of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. FrancisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API