Legal Opinion

Tripani v. Meraux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1935No. 16025PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This is a suit for monetary redress for damages caused by the bite of a dog. The defendant, Dr. L. A. Meraux, resides in the parish of St. Bernard. The petition alleges that the dog had roamed or wandered into the parish of Orleans and that there, while the owner was not present, it had bitten the plaintiff, Mike Tripani.

By a plea to the jurisdiction ratione person®, Dr. Meraux challenged the right of the courts of the parish of Orleans to hear the matter, calling .attention to article 162 of the Code of Practice, which, in part, reads as follows: “It is a general rule in civil…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houston v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Castille v. Caffery Central Refinery & RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  3. Heirs of Gossin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  4. Culpepper v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Montgomery v. Louisiana Levee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tripani v. MerauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API