Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Tate v. Dalton

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1898Published

Motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

The relator Tates’s assignment was not “ a new appointment or a reappointment.” Greater H. Y. Charter, § 1536. The object of the. veterans’ act section, 127, was. to continue, so far. as practicable, the privilege of sérving during good behavior or as being nonremovable, except for cause, to those veterans only who, being in the service of either of the separate municipalities prior to consolidation, enjoyed a like privilege under the then existing law. The relator was appointed under the Brooklyn charter.' Laws of 1888, chap. 583, tit. 15, §§ 1 and 2, subd. 3. His position is designated as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Crummey v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. In re HardyNew York Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API