Biodelivery Scis. Int'l, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, on remand from the Federal Circuit, rejected this Court's remand instruction to implement the Supreme Court's holding in SAS Institute . The Board's action departs from principles of appellate review, and negates the agency's obligations under the America Invents Act. From my colleagues' endorsement of these irregular positions, I respectfully dissent.
The Federal Circuit's Remand Order
Three petitions for inter partes review ("IPR") were filed by BioDelivery. The PTAB granted the petitions on selected claims and a single ground for each petition, as practice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.