Legal Opinion · Dissent

Biodelivery Scis. Int'l, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 29, 2019No. 2019-1643; 2019-1644; 2019-1645Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, on remand from the Federal Circuit, rejected this Court's remand instruction to implement the Supreme Court's holding in SAS Institute . The Board's action departs from principles of appellate review, and negates the agency's obligations under the America Invents Act. From my colleagues' endorsement of these irregular positions, I respectfully dissent.

The Federal Circuit's Remand Order

Three petitions for inter partes review ("IPR") were filed by BioDelivery. The PTAB granted the petitions on selected claims and a single ground for each petition, as practice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API