Legal Opinion

King v. Capitol Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1930No. 1 Div. 612Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

BROWN, J.

All the opinion holds, or was intended to hold, is that the obligation evidenced by the writing set out in defendant’s plea 2, when construed in connection with the facts alleged in the complaint, is not an indemnity against loss or damage merely, but an indemnity against liability, and that the cause of action arises when the liability of the indemnitee is fixed by judgment against him.

That is not to say that the judgment against the indemnitee is conclusive on the indemnitor. Whether this is so depends upon the facts and circumstances, not appearing upon the record. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Fire & Marine Insurance v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Eva v. AndersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API