Shaw Bros. v. Guthrie
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Nashville — Judge'Cranford presiding. August 13, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtRoan, J.
1. A general assignment of error in the bill of exceptions, that the court erred in directing a verdict against the complaining party, is sufficient to bring under review the correctness of the judgment thus rendered. Meeks v. Meeks, 5 Ga. App. 394 (63 S. E. 270).
2. Where a verdict is obtained against a partnership alleged to be composed of named persons, a bill of exceptions sued out in the name of the partnership will not be dismissed merely because the partners are not . named therein as plaintiffs in error.
3. Where a bill of exceptions complains of the direction of a verdict, and it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. LasseterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Duke v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Meeks v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Joyner v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Moss v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Mutual Insurance v. McJenkin Insurance & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Robertson v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- West v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Grahl v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.