Legal Opinion

In re Olitsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1983. He maintained a law office in New Jersey, where he was admitted to practice in 1976.

In January 1998, this Court reciprocally suspended respondent from practice until such time as he was reinstated to practice in New Jersey (Matter of Olitsky, 246 AD2d 910 [1998]). It appears he was never reinstated to practice in that state.

By order dated October 1, 2002, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred respondent. Among other things, respondent practiced law while suspended, lied to clients, made false statements to a court, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re OlitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API