Legal Opinion
Tomaino v. Newman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 2, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The declaration in this action of tort contains eight counts. In counts 1 and 2 Irene Tomaino (hereinafter called the plaintiff) seeks compensation for personal injuries arising from the alleged negligence of the defendant Edward Newman (hereinafter called the defendant). Count 1 is based on ordinary negligence; count 2 on gross negligence. Counts 3 and 4, based on negligence and gross negligence, respectively, are against Barbara Newman, Edward’s wife. In counts 5 to 8, inclusive, Joseph Tomaino, the plaintiff’s husband, seeks consequential damages against each defendant. These counts are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Taylor v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Pandiscio v. BowenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Greco v. Sumner Tavern Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Gile v. J. W. Bishop Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Posner v. MinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Boyajian v. KachadorianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Francis R. Burns v. Turner Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Huska v. ClementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.