Legal Opinion

Huckleberry v. M.C. Dixon Lumber Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1987No. 84-634, 84-971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Maggie Huckleberry and Banner Bouyer, brought this action against Michael Shadrick, M.C. Dixon Lumber Co., Attorney-at-law Russell L. Irby, and the law partnership of Clayton and Clayton.

The plaintiffs specifically charge that the defendants, acting in their individual capacities and as members of a conspiracy, committed fraud upon them in violation of Code 1975, §§ 6-5-100, -104. The plaintiffs charge that the defendants misinformed them and led them to believe that documents they signed were for the sale of timber, when in fact they were for the sale of land.

The elderly and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Stokley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re CummingsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
  2. Camp v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  3. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. SE Property Holdings, LLC v. DykenDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API