Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

'Wills. Estates. Administrators and executors .Powers. Before Judge Roney. Burke superior court. .June term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The action was complaint in the short statutory form, by Moore against the two Palmers, one described as administrator, the other as administratrix de bonis non with the'will annexed of Robert A. Rowland, deceased. The declaration was based on an account, and referred to a copy annexed. An account was annexed which debited the administrator to the plaintiff', Moore. The ■ copy of a promissory note was also annexed, signed by Palmer, “Adm’r,” and payable to Moore.

It appeared on the trial that Rowland died testate, that his widow qualified and acted as executrix, that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toombs v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Fleshman v. FleshmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Brannon v. Ober & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Clark v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Daniel v. Bank of West PointSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API