Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Tri-County Excavating, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 7, 1995No. 94-1388 and 95-1189UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Hartford Fire Insurance Company is the surety on a labor and material payment bond purchased by Mele Construction Co., Inc. (“Mele”). Hartford’s bond required prospective claimants who were not in a “direct contract” with Mele to give written notice of their claims within 90 days after they ceased work. Plaintiffs-Ap-pellees, tardy claimants on Hartford’s bond, are the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 and Michael J. Ragan as administrator of various “fringe benefit” funds associated with Local 542 (collectively,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragan v. Tri-County Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API