Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 1934No. 29PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

Since 1911 the State of Washington has had a workmen’s compensation act applicable to extrahazardous employments. Until March 15, 1927, the statute contained a section providing;

“ If aggravation, diminution, or termination of disability takes place or be discovered after the rate of compensation shall have been established or compensation terminated in any case the department may, upon the application of the beneficiary or upon its own motion, readjust for further application the rate of compensation in accordance with the rules in this section provided for the same, or in a proper case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. ObermeierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Selectmen of the Town of Nahant v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
  4. Oestreich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Howard's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API