Legal Opinion

Zeitlin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1979PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The determination appealed from should be affirmed, with costs assessed against appellant, the intervenor landlord. At issue on this appeal is the applicability of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (ETPA) (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) to an apartment otherwise subject to the Local Emergency Housing Rent Control Act (L 1962, ch 21), but which has been temporarily exempted from coverage under the pre-existing act. We conclude that such an apartment is not "subject to” the older act, and thus is subject to the ETPA.

Section 3 of the ETPA authorizes the governing…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of HousingNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Mandel v. PitkowskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
  3. La Guardia v. CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Goodman v. RamirezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
  5. KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API