Peltier v. Sacks
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege (1) the violation of the rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) the deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law . Parratt v. Taylor , 451 U.S. 527, 535, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981) (emphasis added). To be liable, the wrongdoer must personally cause the violation. Leer v. Murphy , 844 F.2d 628, 633 (9th Cir. 1988). There is no respondeat superior or vicarious liability. Polk County v. Dodson , 454 U.S. 312, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981). A supervisor…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Freedom Foundation v. Department of Labor & IndustriesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Grenning v. KeyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Lobdell v. County of SpokaneDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Nye v. TapiaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Pleasant v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.