Legal Opinion

Pratt Capital, Inc. v. Boyett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 2002No. 1001653PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The dispositive issue presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiffs can amend the complaint to add new defendants after a certificate of judgment had already been entered against the defendant named in the original complaint, where no appeal was taken from that judgment. Because we hold that, based on the facts of this case, the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit the trial court to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to add additional defendants after a certificate of judgment has been entered, we reverse the judgment of the trial court that permitted the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Stead v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. First Nat. Bank v. Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Faith Properties, LLC v. First Commercial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Harper v. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. FOX ALARM CO., INC. v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API