Tomblin v. Hill
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Plaintiff in- this action sued defendants Frank C. Hill and Cornelia Beauvais, seeking to have them declared trustees for her benefit of the legal title to a certain piece of real property situate in the city of Los Angeles. She alleged the relation of attorney and client between defendant Hill and herself respecting said property; also that with the intent of securing the title to said property for himself, he, through the agency of others, purchased a sheriff’s certificate theretofore issued at the execution sale of said property had upon a judgment against plaintiff and in favor of one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marsh v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Olson v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- McLean v. MaloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Addison v. CopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Elliott v. McFarland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.