Legal Opinion

Tomblin v. Hill

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9288PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiff in- this action sued defendants Frank C. Hill and Cornelia Beauvais, seeking to have them declared trustees for her benefit of the legal title to a certain piece of real property situate in the city of Los Angeles. She alleged the relation of attorney and client between defendant Hill and herself respecting said property; also that with the intent of securing the title to said property for himself, he, through the agency of others, purchased a sheriff’s certificate theretofore issued at the execution sale of said property had upon a judgment against plaintiff and in favor of one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marsh v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Olson v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McLean v. MaloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  5. Addison v. CopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Elliott v. McFarland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API