Humbird Cheese Co. v. Fristad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 5, 1932:
Fowler, J.
The appellants claim (1) that the finding of the jury exonerating Fristad from “any acts of fraud or dishonesty” entitled it to a judgment of dismissal; (2) that deferring payment of the plaintiff’s bills did not under the evidence constitute a wilful misapplication of its funds; (3) that the court erred in instructing the jury as to the meaning of the term “wilful misapplication;” and (4) that the court erred in instructing as to the quantum of evidence essential to meet the plaintiff’s burden of proof on the questions involving…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Bowe v. GageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Barlow v. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Great American Insurance Co. v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Universal Credit Co. v. United States Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ziegler v. Hustisford Farmers' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Foster v. BowenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.