Legal Opinion

Seigal v. County Clerk

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to direct the County Clerk of the County of Queens to accept for filing in his office a certificate of partnership of Hyman B. Seigal and Euth Seigal to conduct business under the name and style of “ Kass-Seigal Interiors, Ltd.”

The name thus sought to be assumed by the partnership was that of a domestic corporation which conducted business as interior decorator and retail furniture dealer in the county of Queens from November, 1947 to December 31, 1957, when it discontinued business. The corporation expended large sums of money…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API