Legal Opinion

In re Sokoloff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was served with a petition containing five charges of professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained charges one through four, but did not sustain charge five. The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent cross-moves to confirm that portion of the report which did not sustain charge five; to disaffirm that portion of the report which sustained charges one through four; and to limit the sanction imposed, if any, to an…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Cohen & Slamowitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re Cohen & Slamowitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API