Legal Opinion

Quetgles v. City of Columbus

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1994No. S94A0918, S94A0927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Appellee-defendant City of Columbus (City) adopted an ordinance which prohibits private modeling sessions or other sexual displays in one-on-one sessions and close mingling between customers and employees of adult entertainment establishments. Appellant-plaintiffs brought suit challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance. The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and appellants appeal.

A legislative restriction on adult entertainment must satisfy a tripartite test in order to comport with the free speech guarantees of the federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paramount Pictures Corp. v. BusbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Harris v. Entertainment Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Alford v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Discotheque, Inc. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Z.J. Gifts D-2, L.L.C. v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. For Your Eyes Alone, Inc. v. City of Columbus, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Scouten v. Amerisave Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Chambers v. Peach CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API