Legal Opinion

Pellegrino v. The Procter & Gamble Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 17, 2025No. 7:23-cv-10631Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK REGINA PELLEGRINO, Plaintiff, No. 23-CV-10631 (KMK) v. OPINION & ORDER THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., Defendant. Appearances: Melanie Rae Monroe, Esq. John Joseph Fitzgerald, IV, Esq. Fitzgerald Monroe Flynn PC San Diego, CA Counsel for Plaintiff Cortlin H. Lannin, Esq. Covington & Burling LLP San Francisco, CA Counsel for Defendant KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Regina Pellegrino (“Plaintiff” or “Pellegrino”) brings this Class Action against Defendant Procter & Gamble (“Defendant” or “P&G”), asserting claims for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API