Legal Opinion
Voigt v. Kersten
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1896PublishedCited by 36 opinions
Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
We have carefully examined the record in this case, together with all briefs and arguments, and the authorities cited by counsel for both plaintiff and defendant in error. The opinion by Shepard, J., in the Appellate Court, as well in its statement of facts as in the discussion of the legal questions involved and in the conclusion arrived at, is in accordance with the views of this court. (See 61 Ill. App. 42.) The opinion of the Appellate Court is as follows:
“This is a bill of interpleader, filed in the Superior Court by the High Court of the Independent Order of Foresters of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. StubbingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Benton v. Brotherhood of Railroad BrakemenIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Gilmore v. CourtneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Kersten v. VoigtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Baldwin v. BegleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Gaut v. American Legion of HonorTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Moore v. Chicago Guaranty Fund Life SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.