Legal Opinion
Adamson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1980No. Civ. 22966PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (Gerald), P. J.
May there be a rehearing after an appeal of a small claims matter by trial de novo in the superior court? (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 151 et seq.)
Petitioner Wilfrid Adamson sued real party M. M. Bitker Number One, Inc., doing business as Oceanside Land Co., Inc. (Oceanside), in the small claims court for defects in the construction of his home. The suit was filed beyond the applicable 10-year period of limitations. Adamson won a judgment both in the small claims court and on the trial de novo (appeal) to the superior court. The day after Adamson obtained the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Eloby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Burley v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Cottle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Asbestos Claims Facility v. Berry & BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.