Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mayfield v. Dwelling House Mutual Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1931No. 27678Published

1DissentPaine, J.

I am not in accord with the judgment of the majority of the court and feel bound to file a dissent in this case, and respectfully submit that the simple statement of the evidence in the case leaves little foundation in.my opinion upon which to base the allegations of fraud upon which the title is returned to the former owners after a fire occurred and the parties find that a change in the mortgage clause had not accompanied the- change of ownership and that the insurance cannot be collected.

The bill of exceptions shows that Belle Marion owned a hatchery business in Falls City, Nebraska, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Haas v. Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cerny v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Peterson v. SchabergNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rasmussen v. Hungerford Potato Growers Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API