Legal Opinion

James v. Safari Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 2000No. A00A0848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this case is. whether the statute of frauds applies to the parties’ nonjudicial foreclosure sale. We conclude that it does apply under the facts of this case and reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant Amy James’ motion for summary judgment.

On May 5, 1998, James was the high bidder at a foreclosure sale on two parcels of land. Safari Enterprises, Inc. was conducting the sale pursuant to a power of sale contained in a security deed. Michael Safari, an owner and officer of Safari Enterprises, had also bid on the properties, but James outbid him. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moody v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. R. T. Patterson Funeral Home, Inc. v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Little v. Fleet FinanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Seymour v. National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tampa Investment Group, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Legacy Communities Group, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Howard v. Estate of HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API