Legal Opinion
Graw v. Fantasky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 7, 2003No. 02-3812UnpublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Appellants Christine Graw, Charles Graw, James Graw, Alice Shank, and Samuel Eisenhower appeal the dismissal of their complaint. The plaintiffs alleged that defendants Paul Fantaskey, Robert Kelly, John Keeler, Shawn Fischer, and the Borough of Renovo violated their civil rights and state tort law. 1 Because we conclude that the District Court erred in dismissing the entire complaint, we will reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
The facts from the complaint that the Court must accept as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- DiBella v. Borough of BeachwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Dwayne Rieco v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Belt v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Basile v. Township of SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Roskos v. Sugarloaf TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.