Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 12, 1914PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged negligent failure of the city of Richmond to furnish the plaintiff with a sufficient supply of water for domestic and sanitary purposes. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the evidence, which the court sustained, and to that judgment this writ of error was granted.

In December, 1906, the city of Richmond annexed a large area of territory in which Temple street, on which the plaintiff resides, is located. The water department at great expense laid water mains along Temple street for the convenience of citizens in that locality, even…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Terry v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Chesapeake v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. City of Norfolk v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Leonard v. Town of WaynesboroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Wilshin v. City of FredericksburgFredericksburg County Circuit Court · 1992
  5. Carter v. City of BristolDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API