Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lowe v. Lowe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 1926Published

1Concurrence

Bond, C. J.,

filed the following separate opinion, in which Urnee, L, concurred.

As I think that the appellant’s proof would not support her cross-bill for divorce if the court had jurisdiction, I concur in the affirmance of the decree against her. But my conclusion on the question of jurisdiction differs from that of the majority. On this latter question, I agree that there is logic in the argument that persons who, because they are not residents of the state, are not included under the laws concerning the civil rights and burdens of its residents, must also be outside of the laws which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. United States v. PerchemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Palmer v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API